Exercise & Sports Science Australia (ESSA) has been made aware that there was a web page and fact sheet produced by another professional association which includes misleading information about the scope of practice of Accredited Exercise Physiologists (AEPs). As the peak professional association and accrediting body for AEPs, ESSA was not contacted or consulted in the production of this information.
Accredited Exercise Physiologists undertake a minimum four-year university degree which includes the most in-depth and extensive training of any profession in clinical exercise treatment in Australia.
ESSA always welcomes collaboration with other professions in the name of health promotion, health literacy and patient-centred care. We advocate for a multidisciplinary team approach, and we thrive in team-based environments.
Exercise physiology is a fast-growing profession that creates positive impact on health outcomes and delivers value for money in the health system. It’s surprising that this professional association feels the need to compare to AEPs, when other professional associations can see the benefits of working collaboratively to achieve positive health outcomes.
Scope of practice
The presentation of standards and scopes of practice is a matter for the profession concerned and it is inappropriate for another profession to assume this responsibility. As the accrediting body for exercise physiologists, it is therefore of grave concern that this information was produced without ESSA’s consultation and endorsement.
There are several elements of the fact sheet produced that are framed in a negative way for exercise physiology and the information presented is incomplete. The lack of completeness about the presentation of this fact sheet, leads to inferences that the work of exercise physiologists could be viewed as unsafe because of the regulatory framework utilised. There is no explanation of what is actually in place to ensure quality and integrity or how this works.
It's pertinent for any professional body to responsibly produce unbiased, evidence-based information for public viewing. ESSA is extremely disappointed that this association has not collaborated to ensure the production of this material. ESSA has reached out previously with an offer to collaborate on a similar document, which was rejected. At the time, the concerns raised by this association included that it was inappropriate for one profession to comment on the scope of another. There appears to have been a shift in this thinking where this association now feels emboldened to present a fellow allied health profession in a negative way.
Regulation for accredited exercise professionals
Accredited Exercise Physiologists are not registered with The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) because the risk to the public through their professional practice is low and therefore the government does not need to take on this added regulatory burden.
ESSA adheres to the standards set by an independent body, the National Alliance of Self-Regulating Health Professions (NASRHP). NASRHP aims to facilitate national consistency in quality and support for self-regulating health professionals and satisfy national and jurisdictional regulatory requirements, and sets standards that closely align with those implemented by AHPRA.
ESSA and the NASRHP provides assurance to patients they are receiving a quality service from a certified health professional.
ESSA will continue to work with Government, NDIS, Aged Care, private health insurers, hospitals and the community to ensure that all populations benefit from the delivery of clinical exercise. We will also continue offer to collaborate in the development of accurate information that will support consumers, referrers and funders to understand the different roles allied health professions have in the health care system and how we can achieve patient-centred care through effective interprofessional practice.
There is a health workforce shortage in Australia. Producing unhelpful, misleading information of this nature adds confusion, places further burden on patients, impacting the allied health care professionals trying to make a difference. Rather than taking a functional, holistic approach to patient care, information presented in this way takes a micro lens to addressing a macro issue.
ESSA seeks a public apology and retraction of this content from this professional association for misleading Australian consumers, referrers and funders of healthcare.